No Room For Error Demolition
Had to be exact with this one.
Added: 2 years 4 days ago
Comments: 28
Comments: 28
Del.icio.us
FacebookAdd Comment
2 years 0 days ago by nomather
wtc?
hide replies | reply
1 years 340 days ago by
I concurrrrrrr...
reply
1 years 281 days ago by Outside the Box
You're on the right track...
reply
1 years 256 days ago by no
no you could see all the flashes idiot
reply
300 days ago by arab
us here in afganistan know how to do it better. haha lol we fly planes into that shit
reply
1 years 363 days ago by Anon
very much so
reply
1 years 361 days ago by what??
That's nothing like what was seen in the world trade center. ALL of those explosions is what you would have needed to take down the world trade center on purpose. The WTC fell because jet fuel compromised the integrity of the HORIZONTAL structure of the building while there was fault (hole) in the side of the building. This would take any building down.
hide replies | reply
1 years 342 days ago by jordon
ever hear of wtc number 11
dig around for it
hide replies | reply
1 years 330 days ago by HARRIS
you're getting closer
reply
1 years 231 days ago by Shop 101
Ever dropped a hardened metal file on a concrete floor? Try heating steel beams and rebar to a measly 200 Deg C (You can fan the fire with 30-40mph winds if you want to make it hotter) and then quench it in water from a sprinkler system. Then apply thousands of pounds of tinsel strain to it and see what happens, (Dont forget your safety glasses). This is not alchemy guys.
reply
1 years 324 days ago by Gerald Massy
They must find it difficult...
Those that have take authority as the truth rather that truth as the authority.
hide replies | reply
1 years 320 days ago by will
so true ^^
reply
1 years 309 days ago by g~na
do u honestly believe one airplane carries enough fuel to make it down 70 stories and maintain a heat index of 2000 to burn CONCRETE
reply
1 years 276 days ago by doodle
you really believe that story?
check the facts mate. a plane crashed into the empire states building in 1945 and did much less damange to a smaller building. those towers were able to withstand such an attack.
reply
1 years 274 days ago by uh
There's still never been any explanation for the molten steel, powdered concrete, and freefall speed of both identical pancake collapses.
reply
1 years 360 days ago by banger
Perfect execution, very nice.
reply
1 years 352 days ago by johnny
@ what??
the hole caused by the plane in the facade of the wtc had nothing to do with its collapse since the structural parts were situated in the inner core of the building.
nothing like cutting a tree with an axe if thats what you meant by "fault (hole) in the side of the building...
hide replies | reply
1 years 344 days ago by Openeyed
Right, and as for jet fuel - it doesn't burn anywhere hot enough to cause the resultant pools of molten steel, or even melt steel for that matter.
reply
1 years 324 days ago by infowars
911 = hoax. Do your research. I cant believe people are still convinced by the governments story. Dont let them make up your mind - figure it out yourself.
hide replies | reply
1 years 309 days ago by G.W. Bush
Let me get my tinfoil hat, here's another conspiracy theorist
reply
1 years 277 days ago by ironsam
I wonder if you look as retarded as you sound.
reply
1 years 276 days ago by Bob
1945? Jet fuel? nope. That was a prop plane running diesel. which burns at a MUCH lower temp than jet fuel.
hide replies | reply
1 years 267 days ago by pappa
Yeah well jet fuel only burns at 1300 F. and steel melts at 2000 F. so you do the math genius.
reply
1 years 249 days ago by Only me
I still don't get why anyone can ever think the towers were brought down by explosion. Look at this video. As in ALL demolitions, the explosions are AT THE BOTTOM, never near the top. This video and all the demolition videos look nothing like the WTC collapse. There is No similarity.
hide replies | reply
1 years 249 days ago by Only me
Note, however, all the "dust" stirred up sure did look like the the supposed smoke from the supposed "series of explosions" that are supposed to be perfectly timed floor by floor, starting (amazingly) right under where each plane happened to hit! Did you note how small the demo explosions are as you see them going UP (not down) the building?? No massive dust cloud being pushed out as each floor collapsed as at WTC.
hide replies | reply
1 years 249 days ago by Only me
Did you notice that the SECOND tower hit was the FIRST to collapse (again, amazingly, from right under where the plane hit!) since it was hit much lower thus making the part above the hit MUCH heavier and causing an earlier collapse.
hide replies | reply
1 years 249 days ago by Only me
Finally. the government of this country is not capable of keeping any kind of secret. Everything leaks. No way does a guy in office for just over 6 months set this up.. He cannot even get support form the CIA and the State Department now, after nearly 8 years.
reply
1 years 231 days ago by Shop Teacher
Read my post above....while flames shoot up, WATER pools and drains downward with gravity.
reply
Name:
Comment:
